Messages in this thread | | | From | Ismail Dönmez <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] per-process securebits | Date | Sun, 3 Feb 2008 08:25:48 +0200 |
| |
At Sunday 03 February 2008 around 08:18:12 Andrew Morton wrote: > So how do we ever get to the stage where we can recommend that distributors > turn these things on, and have them agree with us?
FWIW with my distributor hat on I think File system capabilities are very nice and enables one to ship a distribution with a small set of setuid binaries.
On the other hand for per-process securebits, it would be nice to see a complete example how it could be applied to a setuid program. That would be a nice step in moving forward.
Regards, ismail
-- Never learn by your mistakes, if you do you may never dare to try again.
| |