[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] per-process securebits
At Sunday 03 February 2008 around 08:18:12 Andrew Morton wrote:
> So how do we ever get to the stage where we can recommend that distributors
> turn these things on, and have them agree with us?

FWIW with my distributor hat on I think File system capabilities are very nice
and enables one to ship a distribution with a small set of setuid binaries.

On the other hand for per-process securebits, it would be nice to see a
complete example how it could be applied to a setuid program. That would be a
nice step in moving forward.


Never learn by your mistakes, if you do you may never dare to try again.

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-03 07:27    [W:0.049 / U:0.484 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site