lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 29 Feb 2008 22:29:08 +0100
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: [RFC/PATCH] cpuset: cpuset irq affinities
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:

> > Do these irqs have any special hardware affinity?  Or are they just 
> > consumers of CPU cycles that can be jammed onto whatever CPU(s) 
> > we're willing to let be interrupted?
> 
> Depends a bit, the genirq layer seems to allow for irqs that can't be 
> freely placed. But most of them can be given a free mask - /me looks @ 
> tglx/ingo.

yes - and when they cannot be arbitrarily migrated we just dont move 
them (but still keep them attached to that cpuset). The affinity calls 
will just fail in that case. Might want to emit a kernel warning but 
that's all. (if then it's a hardware constraint)

	Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-29 22:33    [from the cache]
©2003-2008