[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andrew Morton <> wrote:
>> It of course lays waste to a series of cgroup patches from Paul Menage
>> which I already had queued.
> Andrew, please stop tracking sched-devel.git and track this tree
> instead:
> git://

Another option is to have cpusets or cpu isolation tree that I've started
already. I was saying from the very beginning cpu isolation stuff does not
imho belong in the scheduler tree. Besides a tiny patch to the sched.c that
adds/removes the bitmaps there are no scheduler changes needed for this

Peter, Ingo, if you guys are ok with this lets just have this stuff in
cpuisol-2.6.git. I'm anyway rebasing it ontop of Peter's work. Of course we'll
go through regular review and stuff and Andrew can track that tree separately.

Just a suggestion. I'm ok with submitting patches via sched-devel. Separate
tree seems more appropriate though.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-29 21:01    [W:0.107 / U:2.604 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site