Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:06:31 -0800 | | From | Max Krasnyanskiy <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > >> It of course lays waste to a series of cgroup patches from Paul Menage >> which I already had queued. > > Andrew, please stop tracking sched-devel.git and track this tree > instead: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched.git
Another option is to have cpusets or cpu isolation tree that I've started already. I was saying from the very beginning cpu isolation stuff does not imho belong in the scheduler tree. Besides a tiny patch to the sched.c that adds/removes the bitmaps there are no scheduler changes needed for this specifically.
Peter, Ingo, if you guys are ok with this lets just have this stuff in cpuisol-2.6.git. I'm anyway rebasing it ontop of Peter's work. Of course we'll go through regular review and stuff and Andrew can track that tree separately.
Just a suggestion. I'm ok with submitting patches via sched-devel. Separate tree seems more appropriate though.
Max -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |