lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> My vision on the direction we should take wrt cpu isolation.
>
> Next on the list would be figuring out a nice solution to the workqueue
> flush issue.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

Is it now the intent, not only that I have to enable cpusets in the
kernel but I will also have to use them in userland to take advantage of
this.

And hot-plug too??

Can I predict that in the future that userland sched_setaffinity will be
taken away also and be forced to use cpusets?

And hot-plug too??

Mark


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-28 13:15    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans