lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] page reclaim throttle take2
    On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Balbir Singh wrote:

    > Let's forget node hotplug for the moment, but what if someone
    >
    > 1. Changes the machine configuration and adds more nodes, do we expect the
    > kernel to be recompiled? Or is it easier to update /etc/sysctl.conf?
    > 2. Uses fake NUMA nodes and increases/decreases the number of nodes across
    > reboots. Should the kernel be recompiled?
    >

    That is why the proposal was made to make this a static configuration
    option, such as CONFIG_NUM_RECLAIM_THREADS_PER_NODE, that will handle both
    situations.

    > I am afraid it doesn't. Consider as you scale number of CPU's with the same
    > amount of memory, we'll end up making the reclaim problem worse.
    >

    The benchmark that have been posted suggest that memory locality is more
    important than lock contention, as I've already mentioned.

    David


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-02-27 09:59    [W:0.021 / U:0.180 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site