![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 02:43:41PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Nope. unmap_mapping_range is already handled by the range callbacks. But they're called with atomic=1 on anything but anonymous memory. I understood Andrew asked to remove the atomic param and to allow sleeping for all kind of vmas. I also understood certain XPMEM customers asked to use XPMEM on something more than anonymous memory. > The situation that you are imagining has already been dealt with [..] I guess there's some misunderstanding, I think Nick was referring to the above problem. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2008-02-28 01:45 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||