lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 27 Feb 2008 08:36:50 +0100
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: include/linux/pcounter.h

* David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:

> > but the main and fundamental question still remains unanswered (more
> > than 3 weeks after Andrew asked that question): why was this piece
> > of general infrastructure merged via net.git and not submitted to
> > lkml ever? The code touching -mm does _not_ count as "review".
>
> I already stated this was a mistake and it won't happen again in the
> future.

sorry - that bit of the thread didnt seem to make it to lkml. I just saw
this incomplete discussion with a denial and with no resolution.

And you did the right thing anyway by thinking in terms of a generic
piece of infrastructure instead of hiding it away into say
include/net/pcounter.h (which nobody could have objected against).

I sometimes think that the forced isolation of subsystems (rather
strongly enforced both by -mm and by linux-next) and their hiding away
on non-lkml lists will eventually hurt the core kernel because less and
less people will be willing to go the trouble of doing proper
cross-subsystem development. That results in duplicated or specialistic
infrastructure, increased code size and longer term, ultimately less
performance. (by the time we notice _that_ it will probably be too late
to do anything about it)

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-27 08:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2009