[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] [x86] rdc321x: Kconfig options fixes for rdc321x

* Florian Fainelli <> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
> Le mercredi 27 février 2008, Ingo Molnar a écrit :
> > these many special conditions in the Kconfig space are way too ugly.
> > (Also, i can see no reason why for example hibernation wouldnt be
> > possible on rdc321x, it's a pure software concept ...)
> I would have thought an embedded device with only flash memory as rom
> storage could not hibertnate.
> Maybe we should turn all those special conditions into HAVE_FOO/BAR
> instead ?

no. Just leave those things alone. Obviously, if you dont initiate
hibernation it wont be done - and you dont have to build it in either.
But there's no fundamental reason that it _couldnt_ work - if a suitable
device was attached. Dont put such hardcoded dependencies into the
kernel ...

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-27 16:09    [W:0.052 / U:3.280 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site