![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:26:18 -0800 > > > On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:03:54 +0100 Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> wrote: > > > > > Yes, per connection basis. Some workloads want to open/close more > > > than 1000 sockets per second. > > > > ie: slowpath > > Definitely not slow path in the networking. > > Connection rates are definitely as, or more, important than packet > rates for certain workloads. but the main and fundamental question still remains unanswered (more than 3 weeks after Andrew asked that question): why was this piece of general infrastructure merged via net.git and not submitted to lkml ever? The code touching -mm does _not_ count as "review". Now that there was review of it and there is clearly controversy, the code should be reverted/undone and resubmitted after all review observations have been addressed. Just sitting around and ignoring objections, hoping for the code to hit v2.6.25 is rather un-nice ... Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2008-02-26 10:29 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||