[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 3/6] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag
    On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Paul Jackson wrote:

    > $ grep mpol_store_user_nodemask mm/mempolicy.c
    > static inline int mpol_store_user_nodemask(const struct mempolicy *pol)
    > if (mpol_store_user_nodemask(policy))
    > if (!mpol_store_user_nodemask(a))
    > if (!mpol_store_user_nodemask(pol) &&
    > So I see no need to waste the instructions needed (in the three copies
    > of this code, since it's static inline) to convert a non-zero value to
    > exactly the value 1.

    Done, thanks.

    > Hmmm ... speaking of static inline ... I can knock 600 bytes (that's
    > IA64 bytes, so equivalent to about 300 x86 bytes) off the kernel text
    > size by not inlining the mm/mempolicy.c routines check_pgd_range() and
    > interleave_nid(). I wonder if that would be worth doing. Perhaps
    > those two routines are in sufficiently tight corners that the duplicate
    > copies of them is needed.

    It seems like a worthwhile change to me even though gcc will pass the
    actuals to check_pgd_range() on the stack. The callers to check_range()
    shouldn't be in any fast paths: migrate_to_node() can take a long time
    depending on the length of the page list and do_mbind() sleeps on

    text data bss dec hex filename
    11695 24 24 11743 2ddf mm/mempolicy.o.before
    11215 24 24 11263 2bff mm/mempolicy.o.after

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-02-26 07:57    [W:0.020 / U:9.300 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site