lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 26 Feb 2008 00:12:29 -0600
FromPaul Jackson <>
SubjectRe: [patch 5/6] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES flag
David wrote:
+static nodemask_t mpol_relative_nodemask(const nodemask_t *orig,
+					 const nodemask_t *rel)
+{
+	nodemask_t ret;
+	nodemask_t tmp;
Could you avoid needing the nodemask_t 'ret' on the stack, by passing
in a "nodemask_t *" pointer to where you want the resulting nodemask_t
written, rather than by returning it by value?

 static void mpol_relative_nodemask(nodemask_t *ret, const nodemask_t *orig,
					 const nodemask_t *rel)

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-26 07:15    [from the cache]
©2003-2008