[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 5/6] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES flag
    David wrote:
    +static nodemask_t mpol_relative_nodemask(const nodemask_t *orig,
    + const nodemask_t *rel)
    + nodemask_t ret;
    + nodemask_t tmp;

    Could you avoid needing the nodemask_t 'ret' on the stack, by passing
    in a "nodemask_t *" pointer to where you want the resulting nodemask_t
    written, rather than by returning it by value?

    static void mpol_relative_nodemask(nodemask_t *ret, const nodemask_t *orig,
    const nodemask_t *rel)

    I won't rest till it's the best ...
    Programmer, Linux Scalability
    Paul Jackson <> 1.940.382.4214

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-02-26 07:15    [W:0.020 / U:36.260 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site