lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 5/6] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES flag
David wrote:
+static nodemask_t mpol_relative_nodemask(const nodemask_t *orig,
+ const nodemask_t *rel)
+{
+ nodemask_t ret;
+ nodemask_t tmp;
Could you avoid needing the nodemask_t 'ret' on the stack, by passing
in a "nodemask_t *" pointer to where you want the resulting nodemask_t
written, rather than by returning it by value?

static void mpol_relative_nodemask(nodemask_t *ret, const nodemask_t *orig,
const nodemask_t *rel)

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-26 07:15    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site