lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Sata-MV, Intergated Sata Device Support
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jon Li wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am curious as to whether there are plans to add support for integrated
>> sata devices. I personally want to add support for a 60x1C0 based
>> device (pci:id = 0x5182). I think adding support should be relatively
>> simple, except for a few issues outlined below.
>>
>> In the original mvSata.c (ver3.4) that has 0x5182 support, the config
>> space is as such:
>>
>> case MV_SATA_DEVICE_ID_5182:
>> pAdapter->numberOfChannels = MV_SATA_5182_PORT_NUM;
>> pAdapter->numberOfUnits = 1;
>> pAdapter->portsPerUnit = 2;
>> pAdapter->sataAdapterGeneration = MV_SATA_GEN_IIE;
>> /*The integrated sata core chip based on 60x1 C0*/
>> pAdapter->chipIs60X1C0 = MV_TRUE;
>> pAdapter->hostInterface = MV_HOST_IF_INTEGRATED;
>> pAdapter->mainMaskOffset = 0x20024; /*the iobaseaddress is
>> 0x60000*/
>> pAdapter->mainCauseOffset = 0x20020;
>> break;
>>
>> I have not yet figured out how all these values are defined in sata-mv.c
>> (ver 0.8). Specifically, where do I define "numberOfChannels" which
>> should equal 2, and "numberOfUnits" which obviously equals 1?
>>
>> I have a current config space (not completed) for sata-mv.c which is:
>>
>> { /* chip_5182 */
>> .sht = &mv_sht,
>> .flags = (MV_COMMON_FLAGS | MV_6XXX_FLAGS |
>> MV_FLAG_DUAL_HC),
>> .pio_mask = 0x1f, /* pio0-4 */
>> .udma_mask = 0x7f, /* udma0-6 */
>> .port_ops = &mv6_ops,
>> },
...

Saeed: isn't this what your SOC patches already implemented for us?
As near as I can tell, sata_mv now already has support for the 60x1C0.

-ml


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-26 01:09    [W:0.087 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site