lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC/PATCH] Update coding standard to avoid ungrepable printk format strings
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 01:55:32PM +0100, Christer Weinigel wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >RFC: Update coding standard to avoid split up printk format strings
>
> While we're talking about checkpatch.pl, I'd definitely like to teach
> checkpatch about "list_for_each" and friends.
>
> list_for_each is flow control, not a function call. I find it much
> easier to see that something is a loop when there is a space between the
> name and the parenthesis rather than when they are smashed together.
>
> old patch follows
>
> /Christer
>
> checkpatch complains about the following:
>
> WARNING: no space between function name and open parenthesis '('
> #520: FILE: drivers/spi/spi_s3c24xx_dma.c:478:
> + list_for_each_entry (transfer, &message->transfers, transfer_list) {
>
> which I think is a bit bogus since it actually is a for statement in
> disguise. The following patch adds list_for_each to the list of things
> that look like functions that it shouldn't complain about.
>
> Index: linux-2.6.23/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.23.orig/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ linux-2.6.23/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ sub process {
>
> # check for spaces between functions and their parentheses.
> if ($line =~ /($Ident)\s+\(/ &&
> - $1 !~
> /^(?:if|for|while|switch|return|volatile|__volatile__|__attribute__|format|__extension__|Copyright)$/
> &&
> + $1 !~
> /^(?:if|for|while|switch|list_for_each.*|return|volatile|__volatile__|__attribute__|format|__extension__|Copyright)$/
> &&
> $line !~ /$Type\s+\(/ && $line !~ /^.\#\s*define\b/) {
> WARN("no space between function name and open
> parenthesis '('\n" . $herecurr);
> }

This has come up a few times. In previous discussions there were
supporters for spaces as well as not. Looking over the existing in kernel
use, the majority are without a space (from before checkpatch encouraged
that usage); and so it is that that won the day.

-apw


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-25 06:31    [W:1.191 / U:0.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site