lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 23 Feb 2008 09:36:58 -0600
From"Serge E. Hallyn" <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] file capabilities: simplify signal check
Quoting Andrew Morton (akpm@linux-foundation.org):
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:15:50 -0600 "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > >From bd076c7245d02be0cc01b7c09bd7170ec5946492 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
> > Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:28:07 -0500
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] file capabilities: simplify signal check
> > 
> > Simplify the uid equivalence check in cap_task_kill().  Anyone
> > can kill a process owned by the same uid.
> > 
> > Without this patch wireshark is reported to fail.
> 
> Strange that a patch titled "simplify...." actually fixes a bug.

Sorry.  Yeah that's a bad subject.

> > Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  security/commoncap.c |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c
> > index 5aba826..bb0c095 100644
> > --- a/security/commoncap.c
> > +++ b/security/commoncap.c
> > @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ int cap_task_kill(struct task_struct *p, struct siginfo *info,
> >  	 * allowed.
> >  	 * We must preserve legacy signal behavior in this case.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (p->euid == 0 && p->uid == current->uid)
> > +	if (p->uid == current->uid)
> >  		return 0;
> > 
> >  	/* sigcont is permitted within same session */
> 
> I've marked this as needed-in-2.6.24.  Was that appropriate?

Yes, thanks.  I doubt wireshark is the only thing that'll break
otherwise.

thanks,
-serge


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-23 16:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2008