[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Question about your git habits
    On 2008/2/23, Charles Bailey <> wrote:
    > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 02:08:35PM +0100, J.C. Pizarro wrote:
    > >
    > > But if the repos are aggressively repacked then the bit to bit differences
    > > are not ~2 MiB.
    > It shouldn't matter how aggressively the repositories are packed or what
    > the binary differences are between the pack files are. git clone
    > should (with the --reference option) generate a new pack for you with
    > only the missing objects. If these objects are ~52 MiB then a lot has
    > been committed to the repository, but you're not going to be able to
    > get around a big download any other way.

    You're wrong, nothing has to be commited ~52 MiB to the repository.

    I'm not saying "commit", i'm saying

    "Assume A & B binary git repos and delta_B-A another binary file, i
    request built
    B' = A + delta_B-A where is verified SHA1(B') = SHA1(B) for avoiding

    Assume B is the higher repacked version of "A + minor commits of the day"
    as if B was optimizing 24 hours more the minimum spanning tree. Wow!!!

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-02-23 14:41    [W:0.021 / U:8.232 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site