[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Document huge memory/cache overhead of memory controller in Kconfig
    On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:33:33 +0530
    Balbir Singh <> wrote:

    > > Another issue is that it will slightly increase TLB/cache
    > > cost of the memory controller, but I think that would be a fair
    > > trade off for it being zero cost when disabled but compiled
    > > in.
    > >
    > > Doing it with vmalloc should be easy enough. I can do such
    > > a patch later unless someone beats me to it...
    > >
    > I'll get to it, but I have too many things on my plate at the moment. KAMEZAWA
    > also wanted to look at it. I looked through some vmalloc() internals yesterday
    > and I am worried about allocating all the memory on a single node in a NUMA
    > system and changing VMALLOC_XXXX on every architecture to provide more vmalloc
    > space. I might be missing something obvious.

    I'll post a series of patch to do that later (it's under debug now...)
    I'm glad if people (including you) look it and give me advices.


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-02-22 08:01    [W:0.021 / U:2.184 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site