lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 21 Feb 2008 15:49:16 +0900
FromKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Document huge memory/cache overhead of memory controller in Kconfig
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:45:13 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> > But for computers, limits is an expected and understood term, and for
> > filesystems it's quotas.  So in this case, I *still* think you should
> > be using the term "Memory Quota Controller" instead.  It just makes it
> > clearer to a larger audience what you mean.
> > 
> 
> Memory Quota sounds very confusing to me. Usually a quota implies limits, but in
> a true framework, one can also implement guarantees and shares.
> 
This "cgroup memory contoller" is called as "Memory Resource Contoller"
in my office ;)

How about Memory Resouce Contoller ?


-Kame



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-21 06:53    [W:0.230 / U:0.030 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans