![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:45:13 +0530 Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > But for computers, limits is an expected and understood term, and for > > filesystems it's quotas. So in this case, I *still* think you should > > be using the term "Memory Quota Controller" instead. It just makes it > > clearer to a larger audience what you mean. > > > > Memory Quota sounds very confusing to me. Usually a quota implies limits, but in > a true framework, one can also implement guarantees and shares. > This "cgroup memory contoller" is called as "Memory Resource Contoller" in my office ;) How about Memory Resouce Contoller ? -Kame | |||||||||
| Last update: 2008-02-21 06:53 [W:0.230 / U:0.030 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||