Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:55:38 -0800 | From | "Yinghai Lu" <> | Subject | Re: Purpose of numa_node? |
| |
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr> wrote: > /sys/devices/pci0000:40/0000:40:0f.0/numa_node 1 > /sys/devices/pci0000:40/0000:40:10.0/numa_node 1 > /sys/devices/pci0000:40/0000:40:11.0/numa_node 1 > /sys/devices/pci0000:40/0000:40:12.0/numa_node 1 > /sys/devices/pci0000:40/0000:40:12.0/0000:51:00.0/numa_node 1 > /sys/devices/pci0000:40/0000:40:13.0/numa_node 1 > > The 5 last lines above would report 0 instead of 1 with an older kernel. > Everything looks correct now (0000:40 is the second PCIe bus and it is > attached to socket #1). > > Thanks a lot, Yinghai! Are you planning to merge these patches in the > near future? 2.6.26? > ingo put them in x86.git#testing
please check http://people.redhat.com/mingo/x86.git/README to get that.
YH
| |