lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Purpose of numa_node?
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr> wrote:
> /sys/devices/pci0000:40/0000:40:0f.0/numa_node 1
> /sys/devices/pci0000:40/0000:40:10.0/numa_node 1
> /sys/devices/pci0000:40/0000:40:11.0/numa_node 1
> /sys/devices/pci0000:40/0000:40:12.0/numa_node 1
> /sys/devices/pci0000:40/0000:40:12.0/0000:51:00.0/numa_node 1
> /sys/devices/pci0000:40/0000:40:13.0/numa_node 1
>
> The 5 last lines above would report 0 instead of 1 with an older kernel.
> Everything looks correct now (0000:40 is the second PCIe bus and it is
> attached to socket #1).
>
> Thanks a lot, Yinghai! Are you planning to merge these patches in the
> near future? 2.6.26?
>
ingo put them in x86.git#testing

please check
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/x86.git/README
to get that.

YH


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-20 22:59    [W:0.048 / U:1.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site