[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Plans for mISDN? Was: [PATCH 00/14] [ISDN] ...

    did someone say interface/API documentation ooops ... <DUCK> seriously
    this is lacking and im sure as time goes on some volenteer (sucker) will
    get it up and running.this is not a show stoper but a nice to have.ill
    perhaps even help out a bit with things, i have some comments on useage
    and module parameters that could be usefull to the would be
    users.remember mISDN is just the kernel bits there is a user lib that
    takes care of userland bits.

    >> b) still doesn't support all the hardware isdn4linux supports.
    > That's a show stopper of course.

    of course not all hardware is supported and in some cases more hardware
    is supported ... there is a precident for this OSS/ALSA where the one is
    marked as DEPRICATED and the other promoted initialy as EXPERMENTAL ...

    over all the most common devices are better supported under mISDN than

    and as with OSS/ALSA both can coexist on the system as modules (only one
    can be loaded at a time or else they dont play nice).

    i really think this is a storm in a tea cup been blown into a hurricane
    after all if it were mainlined (in -mm even) the result would be better
    support and more choice there are far worse supported drivers than the
    mISDN stack.the reality is that isdn4linux is dead idealy unsuported
    drivers need to be ported to mISDN or kept on life support.


    This message has been scanned for viruses and

    dangerous content by Superset Technology, and

    is believed to be clean.

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-02-20 20:09    [W:0.021 / U:1.164 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site