Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:57:59 +0100 | | From | Andi Kleen <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Document huge memory/cache overhead of memory controller in Kconfig | |
> I know this is a pedantic comment, but why the heck is it called such
> a generic term as "Memory Controller" which doesn't give any
> indication of what it does.
I don't think it's pedantic. I would agree with you in fact
that the Kconfig description is not very helpful, even with
my warning added.
-Andi
|  |