[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Status of storage autosuspend

    > > What is the status of USB storage/SCSI autosuspend patches? They work
    > > nicely here ;-).
    > I could submit them, but there is one outstanding problem I would like
    > to solve first. Maybe you can suggest a solution.
    > The problem is how to handle SG_IOCTL calls. It seems that the only
    > safe thing to do is to force an autoresume and prevent the device from
    > autosuspending until the device file is closed. Unfortunately the
    > SG_IOCTL stuff is all handled inside the block layer, and there's no
    > apparent way (other than some dreadful hack) of passing the necessary
    > information down to the SCSI layer.


    > Should we ignore this issue and submit the patches anyway?

    I think you should. "Easy" (and clean) solution to that issue is to
    just return -EPERM from SG_IOCTL if autosuspend is configured in ;-).

    (cesky, pictures)

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-02-18 23:23    [W:0.021 / U:5.944 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site