lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 18 Feb 2008 08:50:18 -0800
FromArjan van de Ven <>
SubjectRe: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:31:48 +0100
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:

> Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> writes:
> >
> > the initial plan was for a depreciation period. Sadly it was
> > untenable since the API was changing entirely to fix bugs and add a
> > really important feature (the ability to clflush the exact range
> > rather than wbinvd'ing the caches of all cpus in the system), 
> 
> Just for the record: I posted full patches to implement clflush
> support some time ago without changing any exported API. So your
> claims that changing the API was needed to implement CLFLUSH are not
> correct.

yeah of course it is possible to make things "smart" by having hidden state.
doesn't make it right.

> 
> Also I believe some assumptions behind the new API are faulty (in
> particular that the caller doesn't fully own the to be changed pages)
> and make it actually impossible to implement the cache attribute PTE
> changing operation fully correct according to the Intel x86 manual
> (which requires temporary unmap)

the Intel x86 manual explicitly only has a temporary unmap when going from a 
cached state to a write-combining state. Any other transition does not require
an unmap. Which makes this not impossible, all a cached->WC transition needs
to do is go via an intermediate UC state and the really expensive process from
the manual is not needed.


-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-18 17:53    [from the cache]
©2003-2008