Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:46:31 +0100 | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] Re: 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 (wakeup) |
| |
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 01:31:37PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > >But I assume in less obvious way. > >It is a bit more intuitive to error out on missing > >-m32 support than gcc failing to support .code16 > >or some other inline assembler magic. > > > > No, you will get the message "the selected CPU doesn't support the > x86-64 architecture". A bit confusing but acceptable.
Sam
| |