[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCHSET] printk: implement printk_header() and merging printk, take #3
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> So, I guess it's NACK w/o suggested alternatives, right?
>> I wouldn't nack without good reasons, and I have none here. I don't have
>> very strong opinions either way.
> I was just wondering whether I should just go with snprintf dancing in
> eh_link_report, which does make sense if not many need merging printk.

Any chance you could poke through snprintf() and look for the off-by-one bug
on the return result? (I think it happens when "n" is exceeded).


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-16 16:25    [W:0.034 / U:7.804 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site