Re: [PATCH 2/3] WDEV, ath5k, don't return int from bool function
On 02/16/2008 12:24 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com> wrote: >> You mean to consider 0 as supported, -ENODEV/-EOPNOTSUPP as >> unsupported and the rest as error? >> > > Yeap, what do you think?
I have no opinion in this case, which one do you (all) like more?