lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 15 Feb 2008 09:04:33 +0100
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: [git pull] x86 updates
* Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com> wrote:

>> thanks, applied - this first looked like a KVM item, that's why i 
>> havent added it. [Btw., feel free to push it via kvm.git as well - as 
>> long as you are sure it does not break the build ;-) ]
>
> Yeah, I'm queuing it as well, it will get there one way or the other.

x86.git won that race ;-)

i've had a good deal of build testing done with that patch and there's 
no [bzImage-level] build breakage that i can report. Which is not a 
surprise, the quality of arch/x86/kvm/ is outstandingly high:

  $ code-quality arch/x86/kvm/

                               errors   lines of code   errors/KLOC
  arch/x86/kvm/                    29           14566           1.9

as a comparison:

                               errors   lines of code   errors/KLOC
  kernel/                         729           92796           7.8

see: http://redhat.com/~mingo/x86.git/code-quality . It's as arbitrary 
of a metric as all static code metrics, but the numbers it emits are 
surprisingly close to my personal estimation of the cleanliness of some 
in-kernel codebases i ran it again.

[ hint, try "code-quality kernel/sched.c" too ;-) ]

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-15 08:07    [W:0.264 / U:1.160 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans