lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
2008/2/15, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 07:20:08AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:48:27AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > > In conclusion, our usage doesn't seem lika a good fit for the probe
> > > approach, although it could probably converted provided we got the
> > > ordering right with regards to regular PCI device
> > > initialization. Doesn't seem to be worth the effort.
> >
> > After reading this, and looking at the code again, I agree. Thanks for
> > the great explaination, I'll leave the code alone now :)
>
>
> Copy the nice explanation from the mail into the code as a comment
> somewhere?
> Sam

I think it is good to do so.

xueyong
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-15 16:49    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans