lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
    2008/2/15, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>:
    > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 07:20:08AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
    > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:48:27AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
    > > > In conclusion, our usage doesn't seem lika a good fit for the probe
    > > > approach, although it could probably converted provided we got the
    > > > ordering right with regards to regular PCI device
    > > > initialization. Doesn't seem to be worth the effort.
    > >
    > > After reading this, and looking at the code again, I agree. Thanks for
    > > the great explaination, I'll leave the code alone now :)
    >
    >
    > Copy the nice explanation from the mail into the code as a comment
    > somewhere?
    > Sam

    I think it is good to do so.

    xueyong
    >
    > -
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
    > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    >


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-02-15 16:49    [from the cache]
    ©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site