Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:31:40 +0100 | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | Subject | Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this? |
| |
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 07:20:08AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:48:27AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > > In conclusion, our usage doesn't seem lika a good fit for the probe > > approach, although it could probably converted provided we got the > > ordering right with regards to regular PCI device > > initialization. Doesn't seem to be worth the effort. > > After reading this, and looking at the code again, I agree. Thanks for > the great explaination, I'll leave the code alone now :)
Copy the nice explanation from the mail into the code as a comment somewhere?
Sam
| |