[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
    On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 07:20:08AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
    > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:48:27AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
    > > In conclusion, our usage doesn't seem lika a good fit for the probe
    > > approach, although it could probably converted provided we got the
    > > ordering right with regards to regular PCI device
    > > initialization. Doesn't seem to be worth the effort.
    > After reading this, and looking at the code again, I agree. Thanks for
    > the great explaination, I'll leave the code alone now :)

    Copy the nice explanation from the mail into the code as a comment


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-02-15 16:33    [W:0.020 / U:62.584 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site