[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 07:20:08AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:48:27AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > In conclusion, our usage doesn't seem lika a good fit for the probe
> > approach, although it could probably converted provided we got the
> > ordering right with regards to regular PCI device
> > initialization. Doesn't seem to be worth the effort.
> After reading this, and looking at the code again, I agree. Thanks for
> the great explaination, I'll leave the code alone now :)

Copy the nice explanation from the mail into the code as a comment


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-15 16:33    [W:0.080 / U:2.232 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site