lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 15 Feb 2008 07:20:08 -0800
FromGreg KH <>
SubjectRe: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:48:27AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> In conclusion, our usage doesn't seem lika a good fit for the probe
> approach, although it could probably converted provided we got the
> ordering right with regards to regular PCI device
> initialization. Doesn't seem to be worth the effort.

After reading this, and looking at the code again, I agree.  Thanks for
the great explaination, I'll leave the code alone now :)

thanks,

greg k-h


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-15 16:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2008