Messages in this thread | | | From | Junio C Hamano <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PATCH] split up feature-removal-schedule.txt | Date | Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:38:20 -0800 |
| |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> >> So in that sense, I think both MAINTAINERS and the deprecation schedule >> are totally uninteresting. Yes, they have merge conflicts. But those merge >> conflicts are really really easy to handle. > > That, btw, includes "automatic merges" for something like a Linux-next > tree. It's easy to just make something that says: if the merge fails, try > to fix up these xyz files by just committing them with merge error markers > and all". > > That's fine for testing, exactly because it has no coding impact (and then > when a _real_ merge happens, you have a human that actually resolves it). > ... > Git if nothing if not scriptable, and things like this are *trivial*.
You can also use "union" low-level merge driver for such files via gitattributes(5).
| |