![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: > I see nothing illegal in what cpu_clock() is doing, that's why I fixed > the sparc64 per-cpu problem I ran into since sparc64 was doing the > wrong thing when booted on a non-zero cpu. okay. I'm just somewhat uneasy about potentially losing the ability to printk. printk must stay simple and dependable. Maybe PRINTK_TIMESTAMPs should be delayed to at the point when system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2008-02-13 14:09 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||