Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:32:26 +0200 | From | Muli Ben-Yehuda <> | Subject | Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this? |
| |
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:16:38PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Why does the calgary driver need this? Can we just use > pci_get_device() instead? Why do you need to walk the device list > backwards? Do you get false positives going forward?
It's not strictly needed, we used it for symmetry. Feel free to nuke it and walk the list forward.
Cheers, Muli
| |