[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
> Why does the calgary driver need this?  Can we just use pci_get_device()
> instead? Why do you need to walk the device list backwards? Do you get
> false positives going forward?

It doesn't look to be performance critical so the driver can
pci_get_device until the end and use the final hit anyway. IDE reverse is
more problematic but nobody seems to use it.

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-13 03:27    [W:0.450 / U:0.500 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site