![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:42:20 -0500 > The kernel is actually worse, because the set/get macros are more complex. > Some live in ctree.h like in the progs, but the nasty ones live in > struct-funcs.c This is really problematic, because you've got these things called "btrfs_item_ptr()" which really isn't a pointer, it's a relative 'unsigned long' offset cast to a pointer. The source of this seems to be btrfs_leaf_data(). And then those things get passed down into the SETGET functions! Then deeper down we have terribly inconsistent things like btrfs_item_nr_offset() and btrfs_item_offset_nr(). Sigh... I'll see what I can do. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2008-02-12 06:45 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||