[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))
    On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:45:55PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
    > It would be very nice to have a separate tree with _only_ API changes
    > that could be frozen well before Linus' merge window opens. It should be
    > a requirement that maintainers use this tree as a basis for testing API
    > changes and even test that their own changesets were properly integrated
    > with the changed APIs.

    The other way that might work in some circumstances would be if we
    tried a little harder to avoid API changes that don't involve an
    interface naming change. That is, instead of adding a new parameter
    to a function, and then having to sweep through all of the trees to
    catch all of the users of siad function, we could instead add a new a
    new interface, __deprecate the old one, and then give enough time for
    trees to adapt, you can avoid needing to do flag day transitions. If
    the old interface is __deprecated at the beginning of the merge
    window, and then disappears at the very end of the merge window,
    that's plenty of time for the subsystem maintainers to move to the new

    This doesn't always work, of course (for example, if we make a
    fundamental change in how some critical low-level data structure is
    locked). But every little bit that we can do to avoid the tree
    integration pain would be a win.


    - Ted

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-02-12 06:37    [W:0.023 / U:6.540 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site