![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Feb 10, 2008 12:45 PM, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 12:24:18PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: >>> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Yinghai Lu wrote: >>>>> I suggest Ivan's patch be merged ASAP as it actually fixes bugs. >>>>> This patch is just cleanup (and takes care of some future concerns). >>>> your patch and Ivan's patch should be merged in one... >>> I really don't care whether they get merges as one or separately, but I >>> think it should be merged _now_ (-rc1 is already delayed), and I'd like to >>> see the final versions of both. Does anybody have them in a final >>> agreed-upon format (preferably with that oddness in quirk_intel_irqbalance >>> also fixed?) >> I just looked at fixing that -- the reason seems to be that we don't >> actually have the struct pci_dev at that point. I can fix it, but I >> think it's actually buggy. I want to look at some chipset docs to >> confirm that though. >> >> I've attached the two patches that I believe are the ones we want. We >> can (and should) fix quirk_intel_irqbalance separately. > > Andrew, > > those two patch just got into linus 2.6.25-rc1. > > I assume that you will drop > gregkh-pci-pci-make-pci-extended-config-space-a-driver-opt-in.patch in > -mm. > > please check some updated patches in -mm that could be affected. hope > it could save you some time > > x86-validate-against-acpi-motherboard-resources.patch > x86-clear-pci_mmcfg_virt-when-mmcfg-get-rejected.patch > x86-mmconf-enable-mcfg-early.patch > x86_64-check-msr-to-get-mmconfig-for-amd-family-10h-opteron-v3.patch I don't think any of these patches are affected. They all affect whether to use MMCONFIG globally or not, regardless of whether not particular accesses will use it. | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-02-11 03:57 [W:0.503 / U:0.080 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||