lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] per-process securebits
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Really? I'd feel a lot more comfortable if yesterday's version 1 had led
> to a stream of comments from suitably-knowledgeable kernel developers which
> indicated that those developers had scrutinised this code from every
> conceivable angle and had declared themselves 100% happy with it.

FWIW, I've reviewed the patch in detail a couple of times, and don't see
any issues with it that haven't already been raised by Serge.

You can add my reviewed-by.

I think it does need more eyes, and some time baking in -mm.

File capabilities are at least marked experimental, although it's not
clear what the criteria would be to unmark them.


- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-01 10:11    [W:0.106 / U:0.696 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site