Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:51:07 +0200 | | From | Avi Kivity <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] module_refcounting and anonymous inodes | |
Sheng Yang wrote:
> Should we push the first patch to 2.6.28?
It's not a recent regression, so no.
> I got some trouble with the separate
> 2nd patch, for I am using Linus' tree and make KVM as modules, so the
> reference count reduced to negative now... (Oh Avi, I know you suggest to use
> in kernel rather than modules, but module is indeed convenient. :) )
>
Right, that would affect everyone. What we need is to hack the second
patch for external modules on <2.6.29.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
|  |