Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:23:18 -0600 | From | "Serge E. Hallyn" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/6] integrity: Linux Integrity Module(LIM) |
| |
Quoting david safford (safford@watson.ibm.com): > On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 12:42 +1100, James Morris wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, david safford wrote: > > > > > These hooks were for alternate integrity modules, and since > > > no one else has defended them, we have to agree that they > > > should be replaced with direct calls. > > > > If you know of other modules which are planned to be ported to this > > framework, merged upstream and supported, then this would be similar to > > the situation when LSM was initially developed. > > > > You've previously mentioned some active projects here: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/17/362 > > > > Are there any definite commitments to push these upstream when the > > integrity framework is merged? > > All of the projects listed in that posting were ones depending on > IMA, with no requirements for alternate modules. I do hope that there > will be other integrity modules in addition to the TPM oriented IMA, > and I do know of several research projects in this space, but I don't > know if/when any of these are planning on submission. If others are > submitted, it would certainly be simple to add the hooks back in.
Too bad the main trusted knoppix site appears to be dead. Was it actually making use of the templating api?
-serge
| |