Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Btrfs for mainline | From | Chris Mason <> | Date | Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:19:09 -0500 |
| |
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 10:45 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 06:28:55 -0500 Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > Hi! > > > I've done some testing against Linus' git tree from last night and the > > current btrfs trees still work well. > > what's btrfs? I think I've heard the name before, but I've never > seen the patches :)
The source is up to around 38k loc, I thought it better to use that http thing for people who were interested in the code.
There is also a standalone git repo:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable-standalone.git;a=summary
This has only btrfs as a module and would be the fastest way to see the .c files. btrfs doesn't have any changes outside of fs/Makefile and fs/Kconfig
(happy new year ;)
-chris
| |