lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Dec]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch] locking, percpu counters: introduce separate lock classes

    * David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:

    > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
    > Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:56:50 +0100
    >
    > >
    > > * David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
    > >
    > > > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
    > > > Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:05:36 +0100
    > > >
    > > > > One small nit: could you please add the Reported-by line for Jeff Kirscher
    > > > > who reported the problem originally:
    > > > >
    > > > > Reported-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
    > > >
    > > > I'll make sure to add that to the commit message after
    > > > you successfully test Herbert's patch.
    > > >
    > > > Thanks.
    > >
    > > early indications are good: after about 15 random bootup tests the lockdep
    > > warning has not triggered. (it would trigger on every 2nd kernel before
    > > that - there's a 66% chance for lockdep to be enabled in my randconfig
    > > tests)
    >
    > Sounds good. I'll toss this into my net-2.6 tree, with Jeff's
    > reported-by and your Tested-by, and send this off to Linus tonight.

    cool. If by tonight you dont get a followup mail from me then you can
    assume that the patch passed hundreds of tests here.

    Ingo


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-12-30 08:25    [W:0.030 / U:31.336 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site