Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 3 Dec 2008 21:40:25 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Series short description |
| |
* Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins.ml@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gregory Haskins wrote: > > Hi Ingo, Steven, Peter, > > This series applies roughly to mainline as an enhancement to the sched_rt > > logic. Peter and I were discussing some of the unecessary overhead in > > pull_rt_tasks() via IRC, and this is my RFC attempt to address the problem. > > > > Hi Ingo, > I was putting together a refresh of this patch and I rebased on > tip/sched/devel. I noticed that sched/devel is on 27-rc8, which is > obviously a little stale. Is this the proper tree to send patches > against, or would you prefer a different HEAD?
tip/master would be the base to use, or tip/sched/core. The sched/devel branch is indeed stale.
Ingo
| |