Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 29 Dec 2008 20:42:13 +0700 | From | "Igor Podlesny" <> | Subject | > There are actually more stable versions available but they are not advertised |
| |
2008/12/29 Éric Piel <eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net>: > Igor Podlesny schreef: >> Actually that's either a mistake or I don't know what you guys call "a >> stable version". > [removing all the part which needs bug report numbers] > > I agree with you that the website is not very clear for someone not > accustomed to the Linux kernel development. There are actually more > stable versions available but they are not advertised. Maybe there > should be more trees displayed, something like this: > The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is: 2.6.28 > The previous stable version of the Linux kernel is: 2.6.27.10 > The latest longtime version of the Linux kernel is: 2.6.16.62
Well, I'd call those versions stable if there were ongoing bugfixes (if affected) backporting to it. Otherwise these are rather "outdated" versions.
-- End of message. Next message?
| |