Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:45:22 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] swiotlb cleanups |
| |
* FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:05:37 +0100 > Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > > > > * FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > > > > > This is minor swiotlb cleanups. It depends on the swiotlb highmem > > > patchset: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tomo/linux-2.6-misc.git swiotlb > > > > thanks, applied them to tip/core/iommu - after Becky's patchset as ported > > by Jeremy. > > Thanks, > > The log of tip/core/iommu looks really wired. Two patches claim to add > highmem support to swioblb. Becky completely reverts the Jeremy's and > does in a different way without any description.
one is Jeremy's that was tested on Xen. The other is Becky's stuff - that also extends it to powerpc - that is not yet fully tested though.
> As I wrote, I recommend you to reorder the patches. There is no point to > merge Jeremy's highmem patch.
"reordering" commits is not acceptable at this stage, we do append-only steps. If you can see any bug in the end result, let us know.
Ingo
| |