Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:06:09 -0800 | From | "Yinghai Lu" <> | Subject | Re: [git pull] sparseirq / irq updates for v2.6.29 |
| |
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 3:55 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> ok, agreed. I was hoping for some more generic workaround but nothing >> seemed to keep gcc from inlining such functions. >> > > Other than blacklisting those gcc versions. It's pretty easy to > understand how a bug like that could creep in, since one of the main > improvements of the early gcc4 series was better inlining as an > optimization.
1. one time path add one dummy printk 2. multi path, could move it to another file. could add one like kernel/weak.c to collect those ...
> > -- > H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center > I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
good to know.
YH
| |