Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 1 Dec 2008 22:47:39 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/6] cpumask: switch over to cpu_online/possible/active/present_mask: core |
| |
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 18:47:38 +1030 Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> + * cpu_active_mask - has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu available to migration
I completely missed the addition of cpu_active :(
It isn't completely clear to me why this exists. Are the various state transitions documeted anywhere?
<looks at the changelog>
It says "This is based on Linus' idea of ...", but it doesn't actually describe that idea. bah.
| |