![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue 2008-12-16 12:31:41, Peter T. Breuer wrote: > > I thought at first that> > time_is_after_jiffies(foo) > > meant that the current time is later than foo jiffies. In fact, it's > the reverse! (as far as I can tell! 2.6.26-11). > > Can we change this name or provide an alternative? Perhaps > > jiffies_is_later_than(foo) > > ?? Yes, it is confusing and yes, it should be fixed. Probably by introducing better names and switching callers to them. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-12-18 08:41 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||