lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): x86
Mike Travis wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Like cpu_coregroup_map, but returns a (const) pointer.
>>
>> (This will go to Ingo separately as part of the x86 series, just
>> airing it here for thoroughness).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
>
> I've pulled this patch into the queue for my cpus4096-for-ingo tree.
>
> [PATCH 1/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): x86
>
> I can also line up a queue for sched related changes:
>
> [PATCH 4/4] cpumask: Replace cpu_coregroup_map with cpu_coregroup_map()
>
> Is there any status on the corresponding changes for sparc, s390? (I assume
> that they'll need to be merged into linux-next?)
>
> [PATCH 2/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): sparc
> [PATCH 3/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): s390

Oops, never mind. I just noticed that all 4 have already been pushed via
linux-next.

Ingo - how do we get these back into -tip for testing with other cpus4096
changes? Do I need to do anything?

Thanks,
Mike


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-12-18 00:05    [W:0.305 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site