Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:03:51 +0200 | From | "Pekka Enberg" <> | Subject | Re: [rfc][patch] SLQB slab allocator |
| |
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > AFAICT this is the special case that matters in terms of the database > test you are trying to improve. The case there is likely the result > of bad cache unfriendly programming. You may actually improve the > benchmark more if the cachelines would be kept hot there in the right > way.
Lets not forget the order-0 page thing, which is nice from page allocator fragmentation point of view. But I suppose SLUB can use them as well if we get around fixing the page allocator fastpaths?
| |