lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [rfc][patch] SLQB slab allocator
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Christoph Lameter
<cl@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> AFAICT this is the special case that matters in terms of the database
> test you are trying to improve. The case there is likely the result
> of bad cache unfriendly programming. You may actually improve the
> benchmark more if the cachelines would be kept hot there in the right
> way.

Lets not forget the order-0 page thing, which is nice from page
allocator fragmentation point of view. But I suppose SLUB can use them
as well if we get around fixing the page allocator fastpaths?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-12-13 10:07    [W:0.171 / U:0.856 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site