[lkml]   [2008]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] block: Fix LSF default inconsistency
Hugh Dickins wrote:

> Sorry, I'm still puzzled: I thought the unevictable lru was for
> shared file pages as well as for anon pages? Of course I agree
> with you over the anons (and shm and tmpfs get counted along
> with the anons in this context), but wouldn't we still need
> an unevictable lru for mlocked shared file pages?

Good point, you are correct. I had forgotten about that
part completely - keeping CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU may be
a good idea after all.

All Rights Reversed

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-12-12 19:03    [W:0.045 / U:9.740 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site