[lkml]   [2008]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] block: Fix LSF default inconsistency
    Hugh Dickins wrote:

    > Sorry, I'm still puzzled: I thought the unevictable lru was for
    > shared file pages as well as for anon pages? Of course I agree
    > with you over the anons (and shm and tmpfs get counted along
    > with the anons in this context), but wouldn't we still need
    > an unevictable lru for mlocked shared file pages?

    Good point, you are correct. I had forgotten about that
    part completely - keeping CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU may be
    a good idea after all.

    All Rights Reversed

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-12-12 19:03    [W:0.019 / U:2.768 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site